If you are human, leave this field blank.General EvaluationLogistics1 is strongly disagree - 5 is strongly agreeThe hotel rooms are excellentThe event/training rooms provide good dialogue/study conditionsAll information for travelling was clear The staff were helpful, polite and professionalTopics1 is strongly disagree - 5 is strongly agreeThe topics are very well selectedThey give insight into the history and practice of Science Diplomacy & Migration They are highly relevant for my workI understand much more about the topic Plenary sessionsThe following sessions were interesting, valuable and enjoyable: 1 is strongly disagree - 5 is strongly agreeEU migration policy (ies), key concepts, key approaches, Where we are today | Katarzyna Pisarska0 for do not attendScience Diplomacy, a sum greater than its parts | Pascal Griset0 for do not attendScene setters, EU migration: EU migration: What is the problem / Who says? Christine M. Cassar, Lenka Drazanova, Despina Syrri, Elsi AdajewEU at the crossroads of migration: Critical reflections, collective solutions.Reiner Muenz, Christos Iliadis, Ernesto Fernandez - Polcuch, Klaudia WegscheiderBorder tensions: Who fixes what with sciences and technology? Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis, Aristotle Tympas, Ave PoomTopical Breakout EvaluationsPlease assess the activities and provide additional comments in the space provided.Select the Breakout Session you attended Human rights and dignitySecurity diplomacy and the political shaping of border control technologies Gender issues: experience of women in migration Policy instruments and integration toolsI did not attend the Breakout SessionPlease check all that are relevant:I had the opportunity to express myselfI felt that I could contribute to developing insightsI felt that the other participants made useful inputsThe materials were well adaptedThe discussion was skillfully moderatedI would attend a similar session againOverall quality of the session1 is poor - 5 is excellentRound Table EvaluationsPlease assess the activities and provide additional comments in the space provided.Select the Round Table you attended Heritage Health Security EnvironmentSpace Science DiplomatsI did not attend the Round TablePlease check all that are relevant:I had the opportunity to express myselfI felt that I could contribute to developing insightsI felt that the other participants made useful inputsThe materials were well adaptedThe discussion was skillfully moderatedI would attend a similar session againOverall quality of the session1 is poor - 5 is excellentWhat was the most valuable part of the programWhat was the least valuable part of the programIn your opinion, how could the event be improved?Submit